These indicators are for use in relation to the pro-forma to help markers to evaluate the study and help in reaching a PASS or FAIL decision. They are not about grading the overall assignment.
Structure / Presentation
VERY GOOD
- the study is logically and exceptionally well presented within the word limit
GOOD
- the study is logically and coherently presented within the word limit
SATISFACTORY
- the study is clearly presented within the word limit
UNSATISFACTORY
- the study is poorly presented but within word limit
VERY UNSATISFACTORY
- the study is very poorly presented and/or is above or below word limit
Process of Practice and Coverage of all Elements of the Assignment
VERY GOOD
- the account of the process of practice is particularly comprehensive and the
assignment addresses all elements of the task
GOOD
- the account of the process of practice is comprehensive and the assignment
addresses all elements of the task
SATISFACTORY
- the account of the process of practice includes adequate reference to each
phase of practice and the assignment addresses all elements of the task
UNSATISFACTORY
- the account of the process of practice is rather fragmented and/or not all
elements of the assignment are adequately addressed
VERY UNSATISFACTORY
- the account of the process of practice is incomplete and/or several elements
of the assignment are not addressed or inadequately addressed
Integration of Theory and Practice
VERY GOOD
- the student is particularly successful at synthesising material from the academic
modules and wider reading into her/his practice
GOOD
- the student successfully integrates material from the academic modules into
her/his practice
SATISFACTORY
- the student incorporates material in the study from the academic modules,
with some evidence of synthesis
UNSATISFACTORY
- the student incorporates material in the study from the academic modules but
with little evidence of synthesis
VERY UNSATISFACTORY
- the student fails to incorporate material from the academic modules
Critical Analysis and Reflection
VERY GOOD
- the student's practice is analysed in a particularly clear and reflective
manner
GOOD
- the student's practice is described in a clear, convincing and reflective
manner with some analysis
SATISFACTORY
- the student's practice is described in a reflective manner
UNSATISFACTORY
- the student's practice is described in some detail but with little depth or
evidence of reflection on practice
VERY UNSATISFACTORY
- the student provides only a simple account of practice with little depth and
no reflection on practice
Attention to Issues of Oppression / Discrimination
VERY GOOD
- the student very effectively addresses issues of oppression and her/his own
anti-racist and anti-discriminatory practice
GOOD
- the student more than adequately addresses issues of oppression with examples
from her/his practice
SATISFACTORY
- the student adequately addresses issues of oppression with reference to her/his
practice
UNSATISFACTORY
- the student addresses issues of oppression in the study but with little depth
or detail
VERY UNSATISFACTORY
- the student does not adequately address issues of oppression
Source Referencing and Bibliography
VERY GOOD
- the student consistently and thoroughly supports statements and judgements
made in the study with appropriate evidence and references
GOOD
- the student consistently supports statements and judgements made in the study
with appropriate evidence and references
SATISFACTORY
- the student generally supports statements and judgements made in their study
with appropriate evidence and references
UNSATISFACTORY
- the student supports some statements and judgements made in the study but
with little supportive evidence or references
VERY UNSATISFACTORY
- the student does not support statements or judgements made in the study and
provides very few references
©West of Scotland Consortium for Education and Training in Social Work 2001.